I've recently posted sample photos shot with the new smc DA 35mm f/2.4 AL lens. I'll contnue to shoot with this lens in different conditions, but I think it's likely that over the next year this lens will develop a reputation as a very good optical value in a compact and light weight design - perfect for someone that wants a quallity walk-around prime lens at a good price point. As I've become more knowledgeable of the performance of this lens, I realized it would be interesting to see how it compares to its other 30-something siblings - the DA 35mm Macro and my favorite FA 31mm Limited.
Below are two sets of comparison photos that I shot over the past weekend. Our weather didn't cooperate, so I had to fit these tests in between rain showers coming off the Pacific Ocean. I used a tripod to keep the camera in the same exact position and just switched out lenses to produce these images. All photos were shot with a K-5 at ISO 400 at f/5.6.
While a thorough test of similar focal length lenses should include comparisons at different apertures, I didn't have the time to do this. By shooting at f/5.6 for all three lenses, I simply wanted to see how the color rendering, contrast, and sharpness of this new lens (at a commonly used aperture) compares to the highly regarded DA 35mm Macro and FA 31mm Limited.
If interested, check out these Lifeguard Stand and Canyon comparisons, and let me know what you see.